Three Stars of the Race
#1 Star: Colton Herta
I chose Herta as the top star of this race because he was noticeable all night. I couldn't take my eyes off the battle between him, Alexander Rossi, and James Hinchcliffe in the mid to late stages of the race. He showed speed and fearlessness, and seemed to be the only one who could pass on the outside of turn 1. But his aggression eventually got him in trouble, as he tried to pass Scott Dixon on lap 229. Though some say Dixon should have given Herta more room, I have to disagree. I watched Herta inching closer and closer to him each lap, and I saw him dart to the inside of turn 3. I thought to myself, there's no way that's going to work, and I was right. Now you can say Dixon should have given Herta more room and considered the big picture of the championship, and allowed Herta to pass, but Dixon had such a good car he could have eventually caught Newgarden and Rossi for the lead. That would yield even more points. To me, this crash was on Herta trying to impatiently force a pass. I do like that he was going for the win, however. Right now I feel like there are too many drivers simply driving around hoping for a decent finish, not really challenging for the lead. I also applaud Dixon for accepting some responsibility (at first, at least). Herta is exciting to watch, and I can only dream about what a super team he and Pato O'Ward would have been this year.
#2 Star: Ryan Hunter-Reay
RHR led more laps than anyone (90), but poor strategy took him out of contention for the lead. I'm not completely sure why he wasn't able to save fuel as well as some others, but I imagine leading so many laps contributed to it. It definitely looked like he had one of the best cars in the race, and I felt bad for him. He needs a win, and this could have been his first one at Texas. He and his team will have to talk this one out and try to ensure it doesn't happen again.
#3 Star: Tim Cindric
I will confess, I looked up at the pylon at one point late in the race and was shocked to see #2 listed in second place. As Rossi noted, Josef Newgarden was not in contention at all during this race. He and Team Penske looked to be having a terrible race (by their standards). But Cindric called Newgarden in during a caution, putting him in position to outlast other drivers who still needed to pit. This is two weeks in a row now where Cindric has pulled off a winning strategy, and he may have just handed Newgarden his second championship. To be honest, I felt deflated and cheated when Newgarden took the checkered flag. Rossi, Dixon, Herta, Hinch, RHR...all of them had better cars, consistently ran toward the front, and were in position to win the race. I know, Newgarden kept it clean whereas Dixon, Herta, and Hinch did not. But I just want to see someone different win a race for a change. I am so tired of Team Penske, and I liked Newgarden much better when he was with Ed Carpenter Racing (and others), probably because he was a bit of an underdog then. I imagine Rossi has to feel similar frustration, coming in second behind a Penske car for the third time in three weeks. I feel like the parity that was so characteristic of IndyCar at the beginning of the year has quickly dissipated. Right now it feels like the only drivers who can win a race are Team Penske, Rossi, and Dixon. Takuma Sato could have won this race had he not violently hit one of his crew members--wow, was that scary, and I'm glad the crewman was alright (and a true badass, wanting to get back out there during the race!). And Dixon has now crashed two races in a row after not doing so in several years. So really it comes down to Penske vs. Rossi--a rivalry that could be good for IndyCar, but only if Rossi can actually beat Penske one of these days.
Race Storylines
As for the race itself, I thought it was very good. I didn't feel like I was able to relax until Zach Veach brought out the first caution, even though the first 100 laps or so were a bit of a parade. This race felt a lot like the Indy 500, with limited action until the second half of the race, and when it picked up, ooh boy was it exciting. Sato and Dixon pulled away easily from the field, but once the sun went down, things changed, as they often do at Texas. Suddenly cars ran closer, and passing was difficult but not impossible. The last few laps were thrilling, and the crowd cheered when Rossi and Newgarden swapped positions at the front. Personally I would've liked to see a little more passing or side-by-side action, but that also makes me nervous so maybe I'm good with what we saw.
There were several possible explanations for why we didn't see as much action in the first half of the race. For one, tire falloff wasn't as great as some expected. I got a look at some of the tires after the race, and while some belonging to Team Penske looked extremely blistered, many others didn't. I think Firestone has some work to do with this tire, and I'm sure they will get better. Second, Texas is still recovering after a repave and lowering of the banking between turns 1 and 2. There never seemed to be a second groove for passing in that area. Rossi tried numerous times to pass in turn 1 but couldn't make it work. And when Hinch did try to pass coming out of turn 2, he spun and hit the wall. I imagine in a few years, the track will be more rubbered in and will return to its old form. Three, teams had limited practice time, with the first practice, and the only one under the lights, shortened by rain. I wish they could have added another practice but I understand they don't want to add one on race day in case any problems arise. And finally, it was incredibly hot when the sun was up--around 95 degrees air temperature, with the track temp much higher. That can certainly have an effect on tires, cars, and drivers. I saw someone suggested pushing the start time for this race ahead a half an hour, to level the playing field some and give us better racing. I fully support that suggestion.
As I said, I attended the NASCAR truck race Friday night and was reminded of why I prefer IndyCar racing. Apparently there were a record number of cautions in the race, and once I saw the third caution in the first 28 laps, I actually was pissed. Under green flag conditions, there was close, side-by-side racing, but these drivers couldn't go more than a few laps without someone crashing. And then, when there was an exciting battle at the front, the caution flag would wave because it was the end of a stage. It was without a doubt the worst race I have ever witnessed in person. But fans were happy because Greg Biffle won. There was definitely a different (and much smaller) crowd at the track on Friday, and while that type of "racing" may have appealed to some of those fans, it did not appeal to me one bit.
At one point either before or during the race on Saturday, I overheard a self-admitted NASCAR fan say that he tried to watch the Detroit IndyCar race (I'm not sure which one) and that after giving it a go, he said he'd rather watch paint dry. I'm guessing he watched race 1, or tuned out quickly during race 2. I also saw some comments by NASCAR fans describing the Texas IndyCar race as boring. As much as these comments infuriate me, I understand them. If you don't know the drivers and the cars, and don't know which battles to follow, racing can indeed be boring or uninteresting. I thought my first NASCAR race, also at Texas, was incredibly boring--because I didn't know many of the drivers. But imagine if that fan had been next to me and I had the opportunity to educate him about the drivers, the cars, the style of racing, etc.--and he could do the same for me about NASCAR. Perhaps this is a pipe dream, but I think the two fan bases can coexist, if we can get over competing with each other about which form of racing is better. The truth is, it's a matter of personal preference. I don't like to see crashes, stages, or gimmicky entertainment. I think IndyCars look sleek and sexy, and I can't pick a favorite driver because almost every driver is incredibly likable. I marvel at IndyCar drivers' skill when they are side-by-side with other open wheel race cars. I love that they race on different types of tracks, so that an IndyCar champion is truly a diverse and deserving race car driver. As I saw this weekend, NASCAR is primarily about entertainment and marketing its drivers. At times the racing is great, but even if it's not, fans will be happy as long as "their" driver wins. You will never, ever persuade me that NASCAR is better than IndyCar, as I'm sure you'll never, ever persuade some NASCAR fans that IndyCar is better. But I will watch both, and I bet many NASCAR fans would too. I hope that I get to see a doubleheader with these two American motorsports sometime in my lifetime.